Price the H-1B Before Registering: $103,265 Fee and Sept. 24, 2026 Decision
Sponsors should price the H-1B decision before registration, using the fee proposal, exemption rules, and the comment window.
| By | The Petition File — Newsroom |
|---|---|
| Filed | 14 September 2026 |
| Read | 3 MIN |

The H-1B budget decision now has a dated checkpoint: September 24, 2026, when DHS stops taking comments on a fee that is not yet in effect. DHS published the proposal on August 25, 2026. The proposal would add $103,265 to each cap-subject petition at filing, on top of other government fees. For HR leads, mobility managers, and in-house counsel, the practical question is whether the budget should carry the add-on, avoid it through cap-exempt status, or price the delay risk before registration.
The fee is a filing-date cost, not a registration cost
The budget line belongs to the petition date, so the approval memo should show that date. A sponsor may approve a registration budget before the proposal is resolved and then reopen the number at the checkpoint. The memo should state whether the cost is tied to filing or to registration, so the approval can be defended later.
The three paths turn on the same fee question
Use the checkpoint to choose among three paths. Each path should be written into the approval memo with the add-on, base cost, exemption status, grace-period risk, and the comment deadline.
- File now under current costs. Use this path when the role is cap-subject and the business can carry the current filing amount. The fee is not yet payable, but the memo should say whether the budget assumes it will disappear. Current H-1B filing costs run about $6,300 for each petition, varying by employer size and premium-processing choice. The add-on targets every petition counted against the 85,000 annual H-1B limit, including the 20,000 advanced-degree slots. The cap-subject filing cannot use the exemption. Grace-period risk stays separate from the fee decision. Reopen the number at the comment deadline.
- Wait for the proposed fee to resolve. Reserve this path for a business that can absorb a later filing and a worker whose status can survive the delay. The fee stays out of the current filing budget while the proposal is unresolved. The base cost stays at the current filing amount. The exemption still matters if the employer can reclassify the filing as cap-exempt. DHS has also proposed ending the grace period that lets a separated H-1B worker remain in the U.S. while searching for a new employer. That makes waiting riskier for a worker whose job ends before a new petition is filed. The wait should be judged at the comment deadline.
- Restructure to a cap-exempt filing where eligible. Take this path when the filing fits one of the cap-exempt categories. The fee would be skipped for cap-exempt H-1B petitions from qualifying higher-education institutions, affiliated nonprofits, nonprofit research groups, and government research bodies. For those sponsors, the add-on is avoided, and the base cost remains the current filing amount. The exemption is the deciding fact. The fee proposal does not change the separate grace-period question. Confirm the restructure at the comment deadline.
Exemption status decides the restructure
The restructure is only available when the filing fits a cap-exempt category. The check should ask whether the filing is truly cap-exempt, not merely related to a qualifying organization. A sponsor that cannot answer that question should treat the fee as a live budgeting variable.
Run the exemption check before the budget is locked, not after the registration is selected. Document the entity type, the relationship to any qualifying institution, and the nature of the work. That documentation is what lets the filing team say, with confidence, that the fee is not in the cost budget.
The approval memo should name the scenario
The comment checkpoint is the approval trigger. If the role is cap-subject and the business cannot absorb the add-on, do not approve a filing budget that assumes the fee will disappear. If the employer is a qualifying cap-exempt sponsor, verify the exemption before treating the fee as a cost. If the worker’s status depends on the filing, weigh the separate grace-period proposal before choosing delay.
File now when the role is cap-subject and the budget can carry the current base cost. Wait only when the business can absorb a later filing and the worker’s status can survive the delay. Restructure when the cap-exempt test is met. The approval memo should name the scenario, the exemption status, and the status risk. It should also state whether the budget includes the add-on or relies on the proposal remaining unresolved. Put that sentence in the approval memo so the choice can be defended later.